OceanPark

My Photo

About

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 11/2003

Raven's Links

  • Alienware
  • Alltheweb
  • Altavista
  • An Atlas of Cyberspace
  • Anandtech
  • Ars Technica Supercomputer
  • Arstechnica
  • Climateprediction.net
  • Cult of the Dead Cow
  • Deus Ex
  • Eidos Interactive
  • Falcon Northwest
  • Game Daemons - Got Game?
  • Game-PC
  • GameSpot
  • GameSpy
  • Geek Scene
  • Gizmodo
  • Hacktivismo
  • Jinx
  • Lantech Systems
  • New Madrid Earthquakes
  • Official U.S. Time
  • Over-Clock UK.com
  • Phrack
  • PimpRig
  • Slashdot
  • SomaFM
  • The Google News Beta
  • Verizon Online
  • Vicious PC
  • Voodoo PC

Categories

  • Current Affairs
  • Games
  • Journal
  • Music
  • Science
  • Technology
  • Television
  • Weblogs

4-29-05 Benchmarking the new notebook

I'm benchmarking the speed of the new notebook tonight with a trial run of a distributed computing project with some regular real world work thrown in, too, which is the word processing I'm doing right now.

This is a fantastic notebook. The technology really has made a giant leap forward since my last one.

I would have used climateprediction.net, but their server appears to be down...again (sigh), so I've launched the old standby, SETI at Home Classic.

Right now, it's estimating a crunch time of 2 hours and three minutes, which would be stupendous. The 1.5GHz clock speed makes this technically the slowest box I have, but it has something the P4s and the AMD 64's don't, a giant 2Mb L2 cache that distributed programs like SETI seem to love.

Slightly more than one-fifth of the way through it's first SETI work unit and it's showing a completion time of 2:07 now. The 1.8GHz and 2.0GHz AMD 64 chips process units in the very low twos, as does the 3.4GHz P4. All four of those computers also have faster RAM (400MHz compared with the Acer's 333MHz). They also have tons more RAM, 3 gigs for the AMD boxes and 2 gigs for the gamer.

The computer with the least advantageous configuration: the P4 2.4GHz with 512Mb of the slowest DDR RAM (266MHz), completes SETI work units in just under four hours.

Running all five for 24 hours would probably churn out 68 work units a day, which is amazing.

My home network now stands at 14.9GHz of processing power, which is very likely quite a bit more than the entire NASA-Houston control center had to monitor the Apollo moon missions. I just love technology.

April 29, 2005 in Technology | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

4-28-05 What a difference five years makes in a notebook computer

The Piii died this past week. Really ignominious ending. The screen blanked and it began to make this little whimpering, mewling noise as it repeatedly attempted to turn itself back on.

Fortunately, I got some serious mileage out of it over the years, particularly the last road trip for work to Arkansas, where it performed flawlessly. More recently, it had seemed as though it was even going to make the transition to wireless. While our new wood floor was being installed, it again got me through another work day using its new Linksys 2.4GHz wireless notebook adapter at a hotel set up with a wireless network.

I knew from work that the operating system we used would perform well enough on an ancient PII 300, so I figured I might get another year out of the much faster Piii 600. But, sadly, no.

Worse, I can't be without a mobile box these days, since I might have to be out of town for work again. So, I've been doing the due diligence thing in investigating notebooks, and while it was apparent that I wouldn't have to spend nearly as much as I did five years ago, it still looked as though I was going to have to plop down $1,500 to $2,000 on a suitable new box.

But then I called my buddies at Lantechservers.com Altaf and Ameen LalaniLatest_family_photos_085 , and they hooked me up big time. These are the guys who built my Intel P4C 3.51 GHz gaming computer and my Dual Opteron 246 and 244 workstations and my Tiny Tower Chassis Intel P4A 2.4. Turns out they are also a reseller for all sorts of brands of notebooks computers, and they steered my toward an Acer.

When I bought the Piii all those computer years ago, it was going to be my main computer, so it needed desktop replacement credentials, and it had them.

It had a 600MHz Coppermine chip, the fastest available at the time, along with an expanded front side bus (100MHz) and 100MHz SDRAM memory. It also came with an 8x DVD ROM player, which was amazing at the time and had 8Mb of video RAM. Also ahead of it's time was the 15-inch SVGA TFT monitor.

Well, that bad boy set me back $2,995 and change. And a high end desktop computer replacement would require about as much today, while a gaming computer would be even more expensive. Fortunately, I don't need the notebook to fulfill those tasks anymore. It will be the work at home and work on the road computer, and it will perform some light entertainment functions while traveling and while I'm bored shitless in some hotel in Podunk, Idaho or wherever the heck they send me next time.

It is amazing to compare the specs on the two, one of which was the state of the art box five years ago while the other is about as "basic" as they come these days.

Old: Dell Inspiron 5000 w/Speedstep technology. New: Acer TM4001LCi w/Centrino technology.

Cost of old box: $2,995. Cost of new box: $899 (!!!).

Old CPU: Intel Piii @ 597MHz, Coppermine core (497MHz while on battery using speed step). New: Intel Pentium M 715, Banias core @ 1500MHz.

Old battery life: 2.5 hours. New: 5.0 hours.

Old: 100MHz FSB, 256kb L2 cache. New: 400MHz FSB, 2Gb L2 cache.

Old: 128Mb of 100MHz SDRAM, Maximum RAM amount: 512Mb. New: 512Mb of 333MHz DDRAM, Maximum RAM amount: 2Gb.

Old: 8Mb of video RAM. New: 64Mb of video RAM.

Old: 12Gb, 4200 rpm spin rate hard drive. New: 60Gb, 5400 rpm spin rate hard drive.

Old: 15-inch SVGA TFT screen, 1024-768 native resolution (considered breakthrough technology). New: 15-inch SVGA TFT monitor, 1024x768 native resolution (considered bare bones technology).

Old: integrated 56Kbps K-flex modem. New: integrated V.92 56Kbps modem, integrated 10/100 Base TX broadband, integrated IntelPRO/Wireless 2200BG network connection supporting 802.11b/g wireless LAN, Acer SignalUp technology for enhanced antenna efficiency.

Old: integrated 1.44Mb floppy drive, modular DVD-ROM drive, reads at 8x. External zip drive needed for storage backup. New: CD-RW/DVD-ROM combo drive. Reads 8x (DVDs) and 24x (CDs). Writes 24x CD-Rs and CD-RWs.

Weight, old: 8.5 lbs. Weight, new: 6.4 lbs.

Old: Windows 98. New: Windows XP Professional.

Dell Inspiron 5000. Inspiron5000 041230_acer_tm4001_1l Acer Travelmate 4001.

April 28, 2005 in Technology | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

3-3-05 The King is Dead

I'm never happy when a key piece of my technology is about to become obsolete, but at least this time, I'm already on the cutting edge of the future.

The King is Dead, by which I mean the single core or single processor unit Pentium 4 in all of its A, B, C, Northwood, Prescott and 500 series chips.

In its place, sometime this year, Intel will bring out the new Pentium D and the Pentium Extreme Edition, both of which will have two computer processing units per core. With hyper-threading enabled, your operating system will recognize them as four processing units, two actual and two virtual.

Unless you are a total non geek or have been locked in a cave somewhere for the past ten years, you know that the Pentium 4 with hyper-threading split its processing power into two virtual units. Problem was, the Pentium 4 virtual dual processor even in its fastest iterations was never as fast as a true dual processor. Basically, you had one seriously cranked chip that was powerful enough to devote 50% of its power to two tasks. But, like I said, the gains this produced were minimal.

With hyper-threading turned off, my 3.4 GHz Pentium 4 'C' Northwood chip would process a typical SETI Classic work unit in well under three hours. But my dual processor Opteron computers were just as fast. Turn the hyper-threading on and the P4 behaved like a dual processor and was able to process two SETI Classic units, unlike any computer chip that came before it. But with half of its power spread between two work units, it's processing times slowed considerably to between 3 hrs 30 min.'s and 3 hrs. 50 minutes.

My Advanced Micro Devices Opterons--which are actual or real dual processor machines (yes, there are two CPUs lurking under the hood) blew away the P4 virtual set up. Not only that, the Opterons are Macroshaft Windoze operable 64-bit processors, meaning that they will work with Windows XP and any other Windows-based operating system, something that Intel still does not have in its stable.

So, as my gaming rig becomes toast in the coming months, going up against advanced dual core technology, I'm at least ahead of the curve in some respects. My dual Opteron 246 and 244 computers are the rough equivalent of having two AMD 64 3200+ and two AMD 64 3000+ chips each inside two computers. Meaning they will be able to compete with any 64-bit dual core processor machine. Moreover, the Opterons are ready for the next Windows operating system, the 64-bit Longhorn edition.

Besides, it's not exactly clear how much better a dual core processor will perform in an online multiplayer game situation. If I'm running some other program that is eating up a serious amount of clock cycles while also trying to frag someone on Far Cry or Half Life 2, I'll get creamed. Theoretically, the true dual chip could devote one processing core to the game and the other core to whatever else the computer had to work on, while my gaming rig game couldn't. But frankly, no one plays that way. I turn off everything that is not absolutely essential while I'm gaming.

But it's like I said some months ago, the days of the single core processors are numbered. Now, we'll see who puts the first dual on the market, AMD or Intel. This time, I'm betting on Intel. They are due.

AMD dual core link

Intel dual core link

Sony's, Toshiba's and IBM's STI Cell processor

March 03, 2005 in Technology | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

2-7-05 Intel Upstaged Again

One of my three favorite computer magazines, along with Computer Shopper and Maximum PC, is free: ComputerUser. For years, I've only used it for the ads, which include most of the local computer builders in Southern California, just to keep an eye on the most common configurations, CPUs, video cards, etc. But lately, I've begun to read the articles (ha ha).

One of the most interesting was from James Mathewson, ComputerUser's editor-at-large, on how the mainstream media got it wrong when they were analyzing IBM's recent sale of its personal computing division to Lenovo, China's largest pc maker.

Mathewson said that IBM's move was not a retreat from the personal computing business that it practically invented, but rather a shedding of the paltry profit margins from the 'Wintel' pc business, where the lion's share of the profits go to Intel Corp. and to Microsoft.

Sure enough, just as Intel tried to regain a little momentum after the butt kicking it has received from Advanced Micro Devices, announcing that it has begun production of its first dual core CPUs, IBM and Sony and Toshiba steal the show by announcing what sounds like true breakthrough technology.

Those three companies are developing the Cell, a revolutionary computer chip with the equivalent of--get this--NINE processors onboard! It is the rough equivalent of a supercomputer on one chip.

IBM isn't abandoning the pc market, it is looking to crush it with a market of its own. Exciting stuff.

Here's one article from the heart of Silicon Valley on the Cell, from the San Jose Mercury News:

CELL TECHNOLOGY EXPECTED TO CHALLENGE INTEL.

By Dean Takahashi


Mercury News

In a bid to upend the computer industry, IBM, Sony and Toshiba on Monday unveiled a new supercomputer-on-a-chip that could change the nature of digital entertainment.

The Cell chip, which will first be used in Sony's Play Station 3 video console next year, could challenge Intel's domination of computing, analysts said.

IBM and its partners predict the Cell chip will be used in devices ranging from from handheld computers to supercomputers. IBM plans to put the chip in computer servers and work stations while Toshiba will use it in digital TV sets.

For consumers, that means they eventually could be able to buy a machine that runs video games so realistic that players will feel like they are inside the animated world of ``Shrek 2,'' according to the companies.

They say Cell chips also will give handheld devices the capability of a supercomputer.

Jim Kahle, a fellow at IBM, said the first Cell chip will operate at speeds greater than 4 gigahertz and will run software more than 10 times faster than the fastest personal computers today.

``This is a shot across the bow for Intel,'' said Richard Doherty, an analyst at the Envisioneering Group, a consulting firm in Seaford, N.Y.

``Intel still uses an architecture that came from a calculator chip,'' he said. ``Cell comes from a clean sheet of paper, where the engineers had the freedom to design from scratch for machines that manipulate images.''

Analysts said Monday that the Cell design is a step forward in computer architecture because balances speed, flexibility and low power consumption.

For now, the Cell chip's potential is unproven, since Sony has not yet revealed the capabilities of its forthcoming PlayStation 3. The consumer electronics giant plans to disclose initial details of the video game console in late March.

The Cell chip will be able to simultaneously access 128 pieces of memory. Each chip will contain the equivalent of nine processors. One is a 64-bit PowerPC processor that serves as the central dispatcher of software and data for the rest of the processors. It will be able to process 256 gigaflops. A gigaflop is a billion floating-point operations a second.

That is 40 times the mathematical ability of the chip in Sony's current PlayStation 2.

Intel executive Pat Gelsinger said in a recent interview that Sony has promised great things before. He noted the PlayStation 2 chip, dubbed the Emotion Engine, failed to live up to its promise to power a wide variety of consumer electronics.

Robert Manetta, an Intel spokesman, noted Monday that a new computing design requires host of new software and programming tools for it to become it useful.

Still, there is no indication that Intel has a response to the Cell chip in the works. On Monday, Intel said that it will begin selling personal computer microprocessors with two processors on a single chip by the summer.

But no one expects those chips to have anywhere near the processing power of the Cell, which will be made by IBM and Sony.

The Cell project also will have a significant impact on Los Altos-based Rambus, which designed the techniques for keeping the Cell processor fed with data.

Hence, for every Cell chip, Rambus is expected to get a slice of the revenues as royalties.

Analysts were intrigued that the Cell uses IBM technology that enables it to run any operating system.

Kevin Krewell, editor of the Microprocessor Report, said that raises the possibility that Apple Computer, which already uses the PowerPC design upon which Cell is based, could use the new chips in future Macintosh computers. Of course, winning over Apple might be considered a small ambition for the IBM-Sony-Toshiba alliance.

``Cell really represents a supercomputer on a chip,'' Kahle said.


February 07, 2005 in Technology | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

1-30-05 Gaming Computer Still Down

My gaming rig is still in the shop, but you'd never know it given the SETI numbers my other boxes are churning out. I've been averaging 40+ units a day, the most ever, and have a new 24 hour record of 47.

I should get the rig back some time this week, with a few changes. Fortunately, the ASUSTek mobo was under warrranty and is being replaced for free.

New configuration:

Intel P4 'E' Prescott 3.4 @3.5GHz, 800MHz FSB, 1Mb L2 Cache

ASUS P4S800D-E Deluxe Motherboard, SiS 655TX Chipset

2Gb (2 x 1Gb paired) Super Talent Dual Channel DDR2 PC3200 400MHz RAM w/heat spreaders

ATi Radeon Pro 9800 All-in-Wonder w/128Mb DDR2 RAM

5.8 megapixel Logitech MX-510 Performance Optical Mouse

Blue LED Backlit Saitek PC Gamer's Keyboard

19-inch flat screen Viewsonic E90f-SB 1972x1344 CRT monitor

1x 80Gb Serial ATA 7200rpm 8Mb cache Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 Hard Drive

1x 250Gb Serial ATA 7200rpm 8Mb cache Western Digital Caviar SE Hard Drive

1x 400Gb Serial ATA 7200rpm 8Mb cache Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 NCQ Hard Drive

January 30, 2005 in Technology | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

1-23-05 A SETI Record

"Ahead now, in the wet evening light, a twirling blue pulse, as of something meant to warn of whirlpools, vortices..." --William Gibson, Pattern Recognition.

Turned in 43 SETI classic work units in 24 hours yesterday. That is by far a personal record. It was all the more remarkable since my fastest box, my gaming rig, is in the shop at Lantechservers with a fried motherboard. Yep, the Intel P4C overclocked to 3.5GHz is toast at the moment, so the record was reached with just three computers.

It's no wonder why AMD and Intel are pushing hard to come up with the first dual core processors. My two dual opteron workstations churned out 37 units on their own in 24 hours. The other six came from my wife's AMD XP 2400+.

If you think that AMD's 64 bit chips are largely sitting around playing poker until 64-bit operating systems and applications come along, you're wrong. The Opteron 246's run at the same core clock speed (2.0GHz) as the older XP 2400+, but they are more than 50% faster in running 32-bit SETI classic work units.

Even the somewhat slower 1.8GHz chips on the Opteron 244 box were able to turn out 9 work units apiece. That's just awesome. When my gaming computer is back online, I'll be able to process about 52 to 53 SETI work units a day.

Right now, I'm flying at the moment, thanks to a level of physical fitness that I haven't achieved in years and the double cappucino that is still coursing through my veins like so much jet fuel.

I was watching the Eagles-Falcons playoff game at the Brentwood Hamburger Hamlet with my friends Tim Ingram and Tom Bagamani and one of Tom's friends when I ordered the double, thinking that it might be passably strong for my afternoon of work. Shoulda noticed earlier, however, that the guy preparing it was Cuban and really knew what he was doing. Damn, it was strong!

Also, right now, the phenomenon known as the Marine Layer is showing double cappucino strength here at the beach in Santa Monica. Just a quarter of a mile inland, the temperature is 10 degrees warmer and the sun is shinng. But from here, on Third Street, the alleyway behind Second Street, just half a block away, is invisible. The sun is so obscured that I ciould look at it directly. The smell of the sea air is magnificent. Any minute now, I'm half expecting to hear the sound of the Hound of the Baskervilles.

I'm going to retool my blog a bit now as far as the albums are concerned. It ought to be fun.

January 23, 2005 in Technology | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Recent Posts

  • 11-22-07 I'm Baaaaaack
  • 1-1-2006 Happy New Year!
  • 6-4-05 Distributed Computing Statistics
  • 5/31/05 On Strike...Not!
  • 5-28-05 What They Thought They Heard
  • 5-25-05 Important Information About your Game Order...
  • 5-21-05 BV Mods
  • 5-15-05 Pariah
  • 5-8-05 Battlefield Vietnam
  • 5-6-05 Another Game Done

November 2006

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Archives

  • November 2006
  • January 2006
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004

Photo Albums

  • Give_a_damn
    Favorite GIFs
  • Ghostrecon_armpatch
    Ghost Recon
  • Wtc
    Twin Towers, Never Forget
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Add me to your TypePad People list